The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons. — Fyodor Dostoevsky

lowepro flipside 400 review

as a photographer i know the agony felt by all photographers when it comes to finding a suitable camera bag. i’ve owned 5 camera bags over the last 3 years.

the first bag was a lowepro nova mini aw which i outgrew quite quickly. it was a great bag, but it wasn’t big enough for my needs. the second bag was a crumpler 7 million dollar home. i loved that bag, however it was quite uncomfortable when laiden with gear. the bag was good around town with a little bit of kit. however over one shoulder (messenger bag style) it was quite tiring to carry around all day. the third bag was a lowepro slingshot 200 aw. this bag was the perfect size (although sometimes a squeeze getting my gear in) and was a very useful bag. i liked the way it was able to slip around under my arm, allowing me access to the bag without taking it off. however, because it was a single shoulder bag too, it got uncomfortable and heavy during extended use.

the 4th bag was a complete mistake. i bought a crumpler whickey and cox. while the bag was beautifully designed, it was just too big for long distance trekking. it was comfortable though. my biggest annoyance with crumpler was the fact that they insist on trying to please the ‘laptop’ crowd by including a laptop option with their bags. the other annoyance was the ridiculous amount of padding. it resulted in less room inside the bag, while being much bigger outside. sure, i want to protect my gear, but there needs to be a happy medium between padding and size.

the problem with bags is that they try and do too much. every bag these days has a laptop pocket. photographers also want spaces for water bottles or bladders. so bag makers are trying to make bags that do too much.

however, i finally found the right bag … and this bag is going to do plenty of work over the next 18 months as i start my round the world trek. the criteria for a bag is that it needs to be smallish (definitely no useless laptop compartment), but big enough to carry camera gear, have some padding, have a tripod holder, and preferably be water resistant.

i didn’t think this would be difficult, but it turned out to be more difficult than i thought. however, after making the mistake with the crumpler, i returned to the company i love most; lowepro.

enter the lowepro flipside 400 aw …

lowepro’s production photos

i picked up this bag and i’m really glad that i did. the lowepro flipside 400 aw has everything i need in a bag. actually, when i went to the store, i intended to buy the flipside 300. i thought the size would be perfect for my needs. however they also had the 400 version, which i took a careful look at too. i realised that the 400 was only slightly bigger, but was significantly better. also, the 300 doesn’t come with a rain cover. the 400 does, which was a major selling point. i live in korea and i picked up this bag for 100,000 korean won. that’s approximately US$110. the price was also very good.

there is only one small difference between my bag and the production photos above; image 3 (loaded bag) shows that the pocket on the bag is somewhat see through. mine is not. that pocket cover is definitely not see through at all.

lowepro’s production photo

the store had 3 colours: blue, black and green. i went with the green. the reason for my choice was simply because the green looks less like a camera bag. in a few days, i’ll remove the lowepro logo on the front and replace it with an australian flag patch. i’ll dirty the bag up and cut off some of the unnecessary straps. i want to make the bag look as much like a regular backpack as possible. i know that when i’ve got a tripod attached it will be obvious that the bag is full of camera gear, however i still want to make the bag as generic as possible. the best thing about this bag is the security. i’m not sure who did it first (crumpler or lowepro) but both have the zipper inside the back, meaning that the bag cannot be opended unless the bag is physically removed from my back and opened. this is a great feature. it means that nobody can steal gear on a crowded street or subway. the back still has a pocket for gear, which can be opened, but that can be protected with a small lock.

i got the bag home and took some photos. i realised that i can get a hell of a lot into this bag. actually, i got more into this bag than i got into the crumpler. it surprised me, but i realised that the padding in the crumpler bag was ridiculously inhibiting.  lowepro have struck a better balance between padding and space.

the lowepro bag i bought. from the outside it has a few very nice features. the small orange logo at the bottom indicates the location of the tripod holder. the strap in the middle is adjustable. it’s good for holding the tripod. there are two straps on the top (left and right sides) which can be adjusted to give the bag more depth. this is useful to keep the bag nice and tight. there are two pockets (one on each side) which are big enough for misc. junk. a water bottle fits in the pockets comfortably.

the bag has an all weather cover, which folds in the bottom of the bag. however, the all weather cover will not cover the bag when a tripod is attached. so if it rains, i’ll have to take off the tripod and carry it. i don’t think this is a fault of the bag, because it would simply be too impractical to make the weather cover big enough to go over the tripod as well.

the flipside 400 also has a waist strap which is positioned well. it sits high on my waist (i’m average height, about 172cm) and is very comfortable. there’s a chest strap too which is thin and a complete waste of time. it’s one of the first things that will be cut off.

inside, this bag is plenty big. the pockets and compartments are completely adjustable. after the crumpler bag, i was amazed how much fit into the flipside 400. without adjusting the compartments too much (i removed a couple of partitions) i managed to fit my:

- Nikon D200 (with strap and battery grip)
- Nikkor 18-200mm VR (on camera)
- Tokina 11-17mm fisheye
- Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 ultra wide angle (this is a big 77mm diameter lens)
- Nikkor 50mm f1.8
- Nikon SB-600 flash
- 7 filter boxes
- Leica R5 and summicron-r 50mm f2 lens
- Spare space at the bottom

that’s a fair amount of gear. even though most lenses are short, there’s a large space in the bottom. i could easily get a longer lens in there, or extend the main column in the centre to accomodate a large telephoto into the bag (on camera). for the moment, i’ve packed the bag so that the space is at the bottom, protecting the more valuable gear if the bag is dropped too heavily. if i put more gear in the bag, the filters and flash (or the leica, which is a solid metal body) will be moved to the bottom.

i forgot to mention, there is also a small pad which can be used in the main compartment. the pad is designed to sit under the camera (in lieu of a battery grip) and is held in place with a velcro strap. the pad will keep the camera sitting firmly in the main compartment. it prevents the camera from moving and bumping around when the camera is stored in the bag. it’s a nice feature for people who don’t use battery grips. if the lens on the camera has a tripod collar, it will sit nicely.

in the opening flap, which sits against my back, there are 3 pockets at the top which are designed to hold memory cards. the main sleeve is currently holding my spectra diffuser. the diffuser kit is quite slim, so even though it’s too long for the sleeve, it still sits comfortably on my back with the bag zipped up. i may rearrange that sleeve later, depending on my final arrangement when i start traveling.

the compartment on the back is a half flap which opens on a section full of small pockets for carrying miscellaneous odds and ends. currently i have my lowepro filter case, geometr gps device, shutter release cable, a few ziplock bags, waterproof cf card case, batteries for the flash, and the battery holder for my camera’s grip (handy during traveling). there’s a lot of room in this big compartment and i can probably get a lot more stuff in there. i haven’t packed it too seriously just yet. there’s one small cute addition, which is a latch for a set of keys or something similar (visible in photo, top right). although, the elastic and plastic clip aren’t very strong, so i can see it breaking quite easily if pulled too hard.

the tripod shoe is big enough to fit two tripod legs and give the tripod more stability and security. the strap at the top is big enough to fit around the entire tripod, however i usually run the strap over two legs and under the third leg, to make it more difficult for someone to remove the tripod without my knowledge. this tripod is a slik pro 330dx. it’s quite a big tripod and sits out from the bag’s top and bottom a long way. before traveling i plan to buy a gitzmo carbon fiber travel tripod. it’s a smaller build and weighs about 1kg, which will sit on the back very nicely.

the cover sits on the bag nicely and (thankfully) doesn’t have a big ugly ‘lowepro’ tag on it. there’s a logo, but it’s not too obvious. technically the bag is not waterproof, but with the rain cover on it, and the bag against my back, the bag will stay dry. so the all weather tag is justifiable. this feature is not available on the flipside 200 or 300 models.

in the wild …

the bag is really comfortable and sits high on my back. with gear in it, the weight is not a problem at all. carrying the bag fully loaded over long distances doesn’t create any undue back strain or tiredness. the bag does sit out a little way, but no more than a regular backpack. i think that’s the beauty of this bag, it doesn’t look like a camera bag. the waist straps are comfortable too, although i don’t strap the bag over short distances. long distances or hiking though and the waist straps are very handy.

conclusion …

the lowepro flipside 400 aw is a great bag. actually, it’s exactly the bag i’ve been looking for. i can see this bag staying with me for a while … and come next march, this bag is going to be doing the hard yards during an 18 month tour of planet earth. the reason i went for the smaller bag was that i need to be able to carry the bag on my front when in transit, because my hiking pack will go on my back. i think this is a better bag than the crumplers and the kata bags i looked at in the store did not look like very comfortable bags at all (and they were bigger too).

pros:

- good security (the bag can’t be opened without taking it off)
- doesn’t scream ‘camera bag’, especially thanks to various colours (i like the khaki green)
- no obnoxious logos to attract unwanted attention
- lots of room and adjustable compartments
- small build
- good strapping (waist and shoulder straps)
- numerous pockets in the back compartment, useful for small item storage
- all weather cover, which folds away under the bag
- tripod holder and adjustable strap
- multipurpose side pockets, good for water and non valuable items
- nice carry handle on the top
- adjustable body straps on the top left and right sides
- small pad which can be used under the camera
- bag is well padded against the wearer’s back

cons:

- useless chest strap (i don’t know why bag makers insist on installing them)
- non removable chest and waist strap (crumpler does allow these to be removed, which is a better option)
- too many plastic buckles – i’d like to see a few more solid buckles, especially the clip that holds the tripod on
- the back compartment has two zippers and is easily opened – the main compartment has good security, so lowepro needs to think up a way to secure the back compartment too

actually, most of my complaints are quite small. i have nothing that i seriously dislike about this bag. and some of the points i like most are related to the bag being secure, unobtrusive and small.

overall, i highly recommend this bag. i look forward to putting the flipside 400 though its paces more thoroughly over the next 18 months.

if you read this review, please leave a comment. i love getting visitors :)

this review is posted at the following sites:

www.photo.net

www.dpreview.com

www.trekearth.com

www.lightstalkers.org


53 Comments

David, thank you for posting the review of the Flipside 400. I think we all struggle with finding the right bag, and information such as you have posted is very helpful. I like that the main compartment unzips from the back. Clever idea! I recently posted a much briefer review of a LowePro Slingshot 200 that can be seen here:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1018&message=29267885. Although I also have a LowePro AW backpack, I chose the Slingshot for vacation travel because of the ease of moving it in front of me, for security, while moving through crowds.
Best regards,
Robert Burke (“EarthSmiles”)
http://www.pbase.com/earthsmiles

Posted by Robert Burke on 5 October 2008 @ 2am

Great review, I must point out that the Crumpler Whickey and Cox has a removable laptop insert, it’s the users option to use it or not.
I was a little cheesed off when LP claimed the rear opening camera compartment as their innovation – Crumpler introduced this feature as early as 2005 CES! :-)
Competition in bags is definitely good for photogs…
Cheers, BBB)))

Posted by Big BAD Benny on 5 October 2008 @ 9am

Thank you for this review. I am also looking for a new bag and i think, it will be the Flipeside 400.
It´s more diffcult to find the perfect camera bag then the perfect wife;o)

Posted by Andy on 14 December 2008 @ 4pm

Thanks a bunch for taking the time to write up this thorough review!
I’ve had the same experience with over-the-shoulder bags, plus there never was a good place for the tripod. I stumbled upon the Flipside – but then, marketing lingo doesn’t tell you what you really need to know… your review did.
Have fun on the RTW-trip!

Regards
Florian

Posted by Florian Hollender on 15 December 2008 @ 1am

David, great review. The 400 doesn’t seem to comply to the carry on rules. Is that correct?

Thanks. Rob.

Posted by robert roy on 31 December 2008 @ 5am

hi robert. thanks for your comment.

i prefer not to fly when traveling, so i have to say that i am not 100% certain of the carry on regulations. however, the lowepro 400 is no larger than a backpack, which i’ve always been able to carry on. an attached tripod may cause problems, but i’d wager that the bag itself will be allowed in overhead storage bins.

Posted by David on 31 December 2008 @ 9am

Thanks for the great review. There are really only bits and pieces offered with the others I’ve read. There really aren’t a lot of bags designed with the female photographer in mind. Unfortunate. It is often difficult to see if a bags straps would comfortably work for women. This bag may work and all of the images helped.
I wonder if the mesh pouch on the side is big enough for a 1 liter bottle (like a Nalgene)? Or is it more of a Gatorade/regular size?

regards, J

Posted by Jennifer on 3 January 2009 @ 2pm

Great review. I’m curious though. You mentioned that the hip belt is not removable. This would be a nuisance to me. I am currently using the Lowepro CompuRover AW and its hip belt was secured on both sides with velcro while it was slipped in to the back pack. It took both hands but I was able to pull the velcro away from both the front and the back of the belt and wiggle and slide it out. Presto, no hip belt. Is this possible with the Filpside?

Posted by Kevin on 8 January 2009 @ 10am

Thank you very much for you great review.
I want more comfort bag than mini trekker classic.
I will consider this one.

Posted by lkunl on 15 January 2009 @ 3pm

Thanks for all the information, it is very useful! Could you tell me how heavy the bag itself is please? Im trying to find a suitable bag for my mamiya rb 67 (pretty heavy camera if youre wandering around the welsh countryside for a length of time!), and Im trying to find a bag big enough, but not too heavy that it adds more weight than necessary to the load.
many thanks
lucy

Posted by lucy gibson on 24 January 2009 @ 6am

You’ve done an excellent job reviewing this bag. You are the reason why I’ll purchase this bag, I was looking at other Lowepro products but after your review this is the one foe me.
Thank you for your time. Hope you’re having a great time in your travels
Regards
Oscar

Posted by Oscar Zangroniz on 30 January 2009 @ 12pm

lucy – the bag weighs 1.6kg (3.5 lbs). i got that from lowepro’s site. http://products.lowepro.com/product/Flipside-400-AW,2116,14.htm

actually, i have no problems with the bag itself. the weight of the lenses and gear render the bag’s weight almost irrelevant.

oscar – thanks for the feedback. i love this bag and i hope you like it too!

thanks for the comments everyone …

Posted by David on 30 January 2009 @ 1pm

http://www.davidsmeaton.com – great domain name for blog like this)))

Posted by foo on 4 February 2009 @ 8pm

Thanks David for such a great review ,you have went a bit further than the standard review that we get .its great to see the customisation you have done giving us an idea of what we can really expect to fit in the bag.
on the strength of this review i have purchased one and like yourself intend to put it through its paces well done and best regards from Ireland,
Kim
http://www.doublevision-images.com/

Posted by Kim Shatwell Irishphotographer on 1 March 2009 @ 8pm

Hello David;

Great review, I was between 2 different brands and models, I think you help me out in the decision.

Thanks;

Posted by Héctor on 17 March 2009 @ 2am

Hi David,

First thanks for the more than excellent review, a lot of websites should take a look at it and reconsider their way of reviewing. Clearly this is a true in depth look at the bag.

I’m interested in buying this bag. I know have Lowepro Mini Trekker Classic, but it’s not comfortable and big enough. I need something bigger, where I can transport my Canon 300mm F2.8IS lens in (according to the Lowepro website that should fit in this bag). I also want a raincover and more comfortable shoulder padding.

I’m a bit afraid if I like the flipside principle (I like zippers in the normal place) also the waist belt is something that I probably not going to use (and it’s not removable unfortunately). I like the way it looks (not typical black like most Lowepro bags) and it seems not too HUGE.
I do use the pockets a lot in my current bag. Do you believe the pockets are sufficient to carry extra stuff (batteries, loader, cables, filters, manual, sunglasses, PD70x, etc)?

Thanks for your reply and keep up the good work!

Tim

Posted by Tim on 25 March 2009 @ 1am

Hi David

Thnkyou for your indepth review of the Lowerprop 400 bag. I’ve been struggling to find a bag that will serve me for a while, and expecially one that is practical and will grow with me as my equipment grows.

I’ve looked at this bag instore, and after having made 2 errors already, decided to google the Lowerpro 400. Your review has made up my mind. I’m off to buy it tomorrow.

Colleen
South Africa

Posted by Colleen on 12 April 2009 @ 11pm

Thanks for the review. I checked out the 300 AW and liked it in store, found that a 400 AW existed and looked for a review. Yours has sealed the deal, will be ordering right after sending this! Thanks.

Posted by Tony on 3 May 2009 @ 12pm

thanks for this very informative review. i am looking for a camera backpack that can be used as carry on luggage on a plane as we travel east to west in australia several times a year. i want a bag big enough for my camera equipment as well as other bits and pieces for the trip. i think the lowepro 400 is going to be my choice. i have watched the small promo movie and it says it can be turned around to the front with out taking the bag off, you didn’t mention that in your reveiw, so i wonder if that is a good feature or not? i think it would be but it may not be as easy to turn around as they showed on the movie clip. thanks a lot.

Posted by Hayley on 25 May 2009 @ 10pm

Excellent review David! A lot of stuff I didn’t think about or see in other reviews.
Thanks a lot, I’m convinced :-)

Posted by Kenny on 4 June 2009 @ 3am

I am heading overseas soon and wanted something smaller than my large Crumpler, but something that would take a similar amount of gear. Read your informative review and headed to the camera shop to try one out. All my gear from my Crumpler fitted (flash had to come out of soft case), in a smaller and lighter bag. Bought it. Thanks.

Posted by John Stewart on 11 June 2009 @ 5am

thanks for the review! will get mine in a couple days :)

Posted by Eric on 15 June 2009 @ 6pm

David:

Finally a REAL review that I canuse to make my decision in getting a camera backpack. Thanks for the excellent review, going to order one NOW that I have all the information…FIRST HAND! Bravo!

Thank you,

Kevin DeRose

Posted by Kevin DeRose on 22 June 2009 @ 1pm

great review! i have only a canon bag which is a freebie that comes with the eos 450D, as my gear out grown my bag, i need one that is durable and comfortable to bring my gears around. i have been considering the 300 and 400 AW, u had me sold on the 400 AW, shall get one this weekend, thanks alot. after looking long time for a good review to ensure my decision, i have come the right place…..Good Job!

Posted by ray on 7 July 2009 @ 6pm

I am using flipside 300 and completely loving it. It comes with one vanity bag that secures right at the inner top.

My only complain is that there isn’t enough separator…i have to make some myself…or maybe, it is an indication for me to get a BIGGER bag. :)

Now i am tempted to get the 400! Thanks for the review!

Posted by Stupe on 20 July 2009 @ 6pm

nice review sir!
Btw, next week im going order one, but i’m also considering the computreker series. It has a laptop compartment but the main opening of the bag is similar to standard bags (unlike with flipside 400, its in the back for more security)

do you guys find the extra laptop compartment worth it? besides you cant put all your laptop stuffs inside (power supply, mouse, extra battery, etc…) together with all your camera stuffs

btw, inm going to use it for traveling and landscape photgraphy. thanks in advance

Posted by taquito on 22 July 2009 @ 3am

hi,
thanks for ur in-depth review.
i am around ur same build and am also considering this bag too after going through what the different manufacturers have to offer.
thanls a lot.
btw, the 2 straps at the top of your bag, u can use them to hold a jacket or something.
might help to disguse the bag a little

Posted by cyliew on 14 August 2009 @ 11am

Hi David,

Just learned that Lowepro has a flipside backpack which seems to be a good balance between comfortably carrying and easy and quick access. The 400 seems to be right size. So I googled it and your review came up first. It is really in-depth review and helpful. Thanks so much!!
One thing I am curious, if you have a tripod attached, say Gitzo 1227, is it still possible to open the bag without putting it down?

Posted by yang on 23 August 2009 @ 5am

very informative review. and yes, i just ordered the 400AW. thank you :)

Posted by Vinay on 13 September 2009 @ 8pm

Thank you David. I bought one from ebay after reading your n-depth review and am really pleased with it.

Posted by yang on 16 September 2009 @ 3pm

I have been using a Lowepro 200 slingshot for the past two years and living in the Pacific Northwest really appreciated it’s “raincoat” feature. I carried two SLR cameras in it plus some other gear and finally the main zipper gave up the unequal struggle!

I was going nuts trying to find a replacement (don’t want the laptop feature) and the reviews were just not telling me what I needed to know – until yours !

Great job – thank you. I ordered on line from B & H in New York during yesterdays major East Coast snow storm and still they will have it here in Sammamish on Wednesday afternoon.

Your review – B& H service – what more can be needed .

Thanks again David !

Posted by David on 22 December 2009 @ 6am

“cons:

– useless chest strap (i don’t know why bag makers insist on installing them)”

While useless for most people, this comes in handy in a few niche markets. I ride and photograph BMX, and when riding around town from spot to spot it is very nice to have a waste and chest strap to keep the backpack securely in place; especially if your jumping up curbs and riding over bumpy terrain.

But i had been looking at several different bags to upgrade from my flipside 200, and didnt even think of this as an option until i found this page. Great information and it ultimately lead me to choosing this pack. Great review! Thanks!

Justin

Posted by Justin on 4 January 2010 @ 2pm

I found your review and quickly decided to take back a lowe pro Outback 200 bag I had just picked up. I went and got the Lowe pro flipside 400 aw. Man I love it. I now have a great every day bag and my computreker for the days I need all of my gear.

Here is the list of what I got stuffed in the new day bag:

Camera:
• Nikon D90 with Mb-80 Battery Grip

Lenses:
• AF NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8D
• AF NIKKOR 85mm f/1.4D IF
• AF DX Fisheye-NIKKOR 10.5mm f/2.8G ED
• AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED
• AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED
• Sigma APO 150-500mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM
• Sigma 18-35mm D f3.5-4.5 AF Aspherical
• Sigma 1.4 teleconverter
• Sigma 2x teleconverter

Tripod / head:
• FEISOL Tournament Class CT-3342 Carbon fiber tripod with Wimberly 2 Gimbal Head

Flash:
• Nikon SB800

Accesories:
Better Beamer flash extender
Pop out reflector
Cleaning kit
Expo Disc white balancer x2
several filters
flash diffuser

Man can you ever get alot in the bag. Plus there is room for 2 water bottles on the outside 2 pockets.

Thanks for your great review. I now have the perfect day bag.

Darren

Posted by Darren on 5 January 2010 @ 2pm

Great review, exactly what I was looking for! Thanks a bunch, you’ve saved me a great deal of time

Posted by BEISBOL on 8 January 2010 @ 9am

For those enquiring about the Flipside 400 as a bag for air travel, I have just got back from a trip, and the bag was accepted onto the plane as carry-on luggage, and fitted into the overhead bins with no problem at all. Obviously, a tripod was not attached. I was flying with Continental, and different carriers have different restrictions. However, it is my experience that the tightest size restrictions are usually presented by the size of the airport security x-ray machines, and the Flipside goes through those with no problem at all.

Posted by Robin on 10 January 2010 @ 7am

Hi.

Regarding “- useless chest strap (i don’t know why bag makers insist on installing them)”, I think I can tell you one reason why they are fitted. If you walk (particularly in hilly terrain) for ten or twelve hours a day you may find that there is a tendency for the shoulder straps to work their way outwards and, depending on what clothing is being worn, this can cause chaffing near the armpit. A small strap to limit how far apart the shoulder straps can move solves this problem. This only tends to be noticed on long hikes and with a heavily loaded bag. The strap doesn’t have to be particularly substantial to do this job. One extra benifit can be that if you walk around with a camera round your neck on a strap you can do up the chest strap over the camera one and it limits the extent to which the camera flops around.

Although I have chosen a flipside 400 for some of my gear, I must say that the flipside with about 7 kilos feels little more comfortable than a Crumpler Zoomiverse with 13 kilos (the waist and chest belts are essential for this to be comfortable for many hours of walking). I don’t think I would be as comfortable with any bag that I have seen from Lowepro with that weight of kit. Of course everyone is different.

As far as the greater degree of padding is concerned, again I think it is horses for courses. The flipside is only about the same size as a medium Crumpler, but can carry more gear. On the other hand there are times when the extra padding is a lifesaver (or at least an equipment saver) and if carrying a substantial value of equipment and in places where it can’t easily be replace at short notice then the much higher level of protection is welcomed (slip backwards on a mountain slope – give me a Crumpler every time).

One thing that I noticed is that the rain cover, whilst it protects the front of the bag very well leaves the zips to the main compartment largely unprotected. There is a decent looking sewn in flap over the zip, but I am still not sure that it is enough to stop water getting in. For that reason I would probably not place the most essential items at the bottom of the bag, where some water might accumulate.

All the best.

John

Posted by John H. Maw on 11 January 2010 @ 2am

you should put a photo of the flipside access when wearing the bag. I dismissed this bag at first glance as I was set on a Lowepro Fastpack 350 – I was changing from AW Trekker purely so I could get to gear without putting bag down. I understood flipside to mean reverse opening as an anti-theft measure, no idea about the swivel in place and access in from of wearer as I did’t watch the video and lowepro don’t show this in their photos – strange, they’d sell heaps more for people not watching video.

So the 350 was going to be a compromise no tripod, no AW and held less than my old bag – yeh for the Flipside 400 AW – perfect and I think it will even hold a 10″ netbook in outer pouch.

Posted by Mark on 23 January 2010 @ 4pm

Hi, Read you review and decided to go for the 400 instead of the 300 which I was initially interested in. Thank you for your thorough review.
Ken

Posted by Ken on 17 February 2010 @ 9pm

Hi David, very nice review. The in-use pics are especially valuable.

I have to take issue with your view on the sternum strap though! I find them very useful even on my 15L daypack, if it’s got any weight in it, to keep the straps at the correct width and to keep the load from sagging back. I don’t do it up tightly. A properly-adjusted sternum strap means straps cut into your (well, my) shoulders less and makes the load less tiring to carry. If your packs sit just right and the straps don’t creep without one, then I’d say you really lucked out with the fit.

Posted by a chris on 21 February 2010 @ 12am

Very good review. I’ve been considering this bag, but now I think I’ve made my decision. :) Thanks for taking the time to share this.

Posted by Patrick on 4 March 2010 @ 12pm

Like many hear, I’ve been vacillating betw a Crumpler backpack and the LP Flipside 400. been coming to nearly the same conclusions about the advantages of 400. Going to get one today online. Thanks. This review hit the spot!

Posted by Ken Fong on 5 March 2010 @ 2am

Following up on my last comment, I picked up the FP400 and I am very happy with it. In the main compartment, I have room for my Nikon D300S, 4 lenses (including a 70-200), speedlight, cleaning kit, and still room to spare. Also, I find this much more comfortable than the Slingshot 200 and it feels “lighter” even though there is more gear inside. I highly recommend this bag to anyone who may be considering it. A+++

Posted by Patrick on 7 March 2010 @ 7pm

Great review!
Convinced me. Especially the part about the bag looking like a normal backpack.
Do you think my Slik Mini II GM will get inside the bag, along with my D5000 and two lenses?

Thank you for sharing this review.

Posted by Udi on 22 March 2010 @ 7am

What a thorough and useful review, thank you very much. Some of your circumstances are remarkably similar to mine, especially the burgeoning kit collection and the semmingly endless search for the “right bag.” I too have been through a few, some have been good, some not so, but the compromises were always to great. I think you have helped me to find the right bag, at leasy I hope so, because I have just clicked the button on eBay and bought one! The price of GBP £65 (around USD $96) inc. dfelivery was the best I could find and seems pretty keen. I’ll let you know how I get on when the thing arrives. Best wishes and thanks again.

Posted by Chiz on 27 March 2010 @ 12am

great review, thx for the help

Posted by randy on 27 March 2010 @ 4am

I have a Tamrac Expedition 5 – about the same size as the LP 400AW, a great bag but it makes my back ache!! I’m over 6’2″ tall, any tallies out there know if the Lowepro is comfortable?

PS Thanks for the thorough review!

Posted by Peter on 10 April 2010 @ 11pm

Hi DAvid, I’ve mad my mind to chose the Flipside 400 but still trying to get some additional review, and your review is so thorough. Well done!
However, it’s a pity that the green colour is hard to find in Indonesia. I love that colour too.
I am still trying as many as store possible whether they provide the green one before making the order.
Thank you very much for your review.

Posted by Yoga P on 24 May 2010 @ 5pm

Thanks for the review, helped me a lot to choose this bag, I’ll hope it’ll fill my needs!

Posted by Qoq Qoq on 18 June 2010 @ 9pm

Thanks for the great informative review. I have one question, does the side mesh pocket fit a 1 Liter Nalgene bottle or is it designed for smaller bottled water?

Posted by Sean on 27 June 2010 @ 6am

[...] lowepro flipside 400 review | davidsmeaton.com [...]

Posted by Lowepro Fastpack 350 Slr Camera Backpack Blueblack | Adolphsollenberger606's Blog on 8 July 2010 @ 8pm

[...] lowepro flipside 400 review | davidsmeaton.com [...]

Posted by Lowepro Fastpack 350 Slr Camera Backpack Blueblack | Abdulreeks595's Blog on 10 July 2010 @ 1am

[...] lowepro flipside 400 review | davidsmeaton.com [...]

Posted by Lowepro Fastpack 350 Slr Camera Backpack Blueblack | givenchy perfume set blog on 25 July 2010 @ 10pm

Thanks for this super detailed review. I was struggling to find the right bag for me and I think this is it.

Just one thing, though: the chest strap isn’t useless at all. I use it all the time when I go walking around because if the bag weights a lot it tends to pull backwards. If you clip the ches strap then some of the weight rests on you chest, so the pull on your bag isn’t so that you have to bend to balance ;)

My sore back loves the chest strap hehehe.

Posted by Cati on 6 August 2010 @ 12am

Leave a Comment